Organizational and technological compatibility of maintenance processes of N2 category car
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31734/agroengineering2022.26.109Keywords:
cars, maintenance, technological process, specialization, compatibility, postAbstract
Organizational and technological compatibility (OTC) is a property that determines both the possibility and feasibility of combining various technological processes (TP) of repair and maintenance in a common flow. This property is due to the similarity of the design, the same type of technology and subject flexibility of the repair and technological equipment used, and, as a result, the similarity of the technological and production structures of various technological processes of repair and maintenance. Therefore, organizational and technological compatibility characterizes both necessary and sufficient conditions for combining various technological processes of repair or maintenance in a common flow.
However, these are just the necessary conditions for combining technological processes of maintenance of different objects in a common flow.
The development of multi-subject specialization, both poly-subject and poly-technological, is extremely important for ensuring effective processes of technical service and they are based on studies of the organizational and technological compatibility of technological processes.
The article proposes to investigate the optimization of the production structure of car maintenance points at stationary posts by reducing the costs of carrying out various types of maintenance due to combining their execution in a common flow. These regulations are developed for the given structure of the inter-repair cycle and the normative average annual mileage of cars. Various maintenance of cars can be performed both in a joint flow (poly-technological specialization) and at specialized points of technical service (PTS) (mono-technological specialization), which are selected from pre-synthesized parametric series. To substantiate the specialization, it is necessary to compare the maintenance costs. If the costs in the common stream are lower than the costs at the specialized posts, then the technological processes of maintenance are compatible, if they are higher, then incompatible.
References
Barabash, R. I., & Mykhaliuk, M. A. (2021). Analiz zalezhnostei parametriv ta pokaznykiv efektyvnosti tekhnolohichnoho protsesu TO-2 ta TO-3 traktoriv KhTZ-16131. Naukovyi visnyk Tavriiskoho derzhavnoho ahrotekhnolohichnoho universytetu: Elektronne naukove fakhove vydannia. Melotopol: TDATU, Iss. 11, vol. 2, 23. Retrieved from http://www.tsatu.edu.ua/tstt/wp-content/uploads/sites/6/naukovyj-visnyk-tdatu-2021-vypusk-11-tom-2.pdf.
Kuzminskyi, R. (2005). Struktura, parametry ta efektyvnist tekhnolohichnykh protsesiv remontu. Visnyk Lvivskoho derzhavnoho universytetu. Ahroinzhenerni doslidzhennia, 9, 50-60.
Kuzminskyi, R. D. (1992). Orhanizatsiino-tekhnolohichna sutnist protsesiv remontu riznykh obiektiv u spilnomu pototsi. In Nadiinist i remont mashyn u silskomu hospodarstvi: Zb. nauk. prats (рр. 17-29). Lviv: Lviv. s.-h. in-t.
Kuzminskyi, R. D. (1992). Systema pokaznykiv orhanizatsiino-tekhnolohichnoi sutnosti protsesiv remontu. Nadiinist i remont mashyn u silskomu hospodarstvi: Zb. nauk. prats (рр. 29-40). Lviv: Lviv. s.-h. in-t.
Kuzminskyi, R. D. (1993). Rezultaty rozrakhunku oblastei ta koefitsiientiv orhanizatsiino-tekhnolohichnoi sumisnosti dlia tekhnolohichnykh linii. In Nadiinist i remont mashyn u silskomu hospodarstvi: Zb. nauk. prats (рр. 27-39). Lviv: Lviv. s.-h. in-t.
Kuzminskyi, R. D. (2006). Vdoskonalennia systemy pokaznykiv orhanizatsiino-tekhnolohichnoi sumisnosti protsesiv remontu obiektiv u spilnomu pototsi. In Teoriia i praktyka APK: Materialy Mizhnar. nauk.-prakt. Forumu (t. 2, 354-359). Lviv: Lvivskyi derzhavnyi ahrarnyi universytet.
Kuzminskyi, R. D. (2009). Vplyv dynamiky zminy chastkovykh prohram remontu na zalezhnosti pokaznykiv orhanizatsino-tekhnolohichnoi sumisnosta vid tryvalosti taktu. Visnyk Lvivskoho natsionalnoho ahrarnoho universytetu. Ahroinzhenerna dislidzhennia, 13(2), 43-51.
Kuzminskyi, R. D. (2011). Rozrakhunok orhanizatsiino-tekhnolohichnoi sumisnosti protesiv remontu riznukh obiektiv z urakhuvanniam dynamiky zminy chastkovykh prohram. In Zbirnyk naukovykh prats Kirovohradskoho natsionalnoho tekhnichnoho universyetu. Tekhnika v silskohospodarskomu vyrobnytstvi, haluzeve mashynobuduvannia, avtomatyzatsia (24, ch. 2, pp. 50-53). Kirovohrad: KNTU.
Kuzminskyi, R. D., & Barabash, R. I. (2019). Orhanizatsiino-tekhnolohichna sumisnist tekhnolohichnykh protsesiv, yaki vykonuiutsia na statsionarnykh postakh. In Kramatorski chytannia: Materialy VI Mizhnar. nauk.-tekhn.konf. (pp. 257-259). Kyiv: Publishing Center of NUBiP Ukrainy.
Kuzminskyj, R., & Barabash, R. (2018). Organizational and technological compatibility of the technological processes of second and third line maintenance of KhTZ-3522 tractors. BIO Web of Conferences, 10, 02015, 1–8. doi: 10.1051/bioconf/20181002015.
Kuzminskyi, R. D., Ivanyshyn, V. V., Barabash, R. I., & Tkach, O. V. (2016). Vplyv zbilshennia kilkosti postiv na pokaznyky efektyvnosti tekhnolohichnykh protsesiv tekhnichnoho obslyhovyvannia traktoriv KhTZ-3522. Zbirnyk naukovykh prats Podilskoho derzhavnoho ahrarno-tekhnchnoho universytetu. Tekhnichni nauky, 24(2), 175-184.
Kuzminskyj, R., Krajnyk, L., Barabash, R., & Sosnowski, S. (2017). Organizational and technological compatibility of the technological processes of all different types of maintenance of KhTZ-3522 tractors in the joint technological flow. Econtechmod. An International Quarterly Journal on Economics of Technology and Modelling Processes, 6(3), 5-16.
Kuzminskyi, R. D., & Sokolovskyi, O. R. (2011). Alhorytm proektuvannia tekhnolohichnykh protsesiv, yaki vykonuiutsia na statsionarnykh postakh. In Silskohospodarsk mashyny: Zb. nauk. statei (21, ch. 1, pp. 228-235). Lutsk: LNTU.
Kuzminsky, R., & Stukalets, I. (2008). Rozrakhunok pokaznykiv orhanizatsiino-tekhnolohichnoi sumisnosti tekhnolohichnykh protsesiv remontu riznykh obiektiv dlia okremoho taktu. In Ekolohichni, tekhnolohichni ta sotsialno-ekonomichni aspekty vykorystannia materialno-tekhnichnoi bazy APK: Materialy Mizhnar. nauk.-prakt. Forumu (pp. 406-409). Lviv: Lviv nats. ahrar. un-t.
Kuzminsky, R., & Stukalets, I. (2011). Orhanizatsiino-tekhnolohichna sumisnist protsesiv remontu holovok blokiv tsylindriv dvyhuniv YaMZ-236, -240 na tekhnolohichnykh dilnytsiakh riznoii produktsii. Motrol: Motoryzacja i energetyka rolnictwa, 13D, 189-197.
Molodyk, M. V. (1999). Prohnozuvannia rozvytku ta otsinka riznykh form tekhnichnoho servisu v APK Ukrainy. In Systemni metody keruvannia, tekhnolohia na orhanizatsia vyrobnytsva, remontu i ekspluatatsii avtomobiliv (Vol. 6, s. 58-62). Kyiv.
Molodyk, M. V. (2009). Naukovi osnovy systemy tekhnichnoho obsluhovuvannia i remontu mashyn. Kirovohrad: KOD.
Molodyk, M. V., Morhun, A. M., Shapoval, L. I., & Yena, O. V. (2001). Orhanizatsiini formy tekhnichnoho servisu ta prohnoz yikh rozvytku v rynkovykh umovakh hospodariuvannia v ahropromyslovomu kompleksi Ukraiiny. Kyiv: Rekomendatsii.
Stukalets, I. H. (2004). Orhanizatsiino-tekhnolohichna sumisnist remontno-vidnovnykh protsesiv pidpruiemstv bahatopredmetnoi spetsializatsii. Studentska molod i naukovyi prohres v APK: Materialy Mizhnar. stud. nauk. konf. (26-30 veresnia 2004 r.) (s. 333-341). Lviv: Lviv. derzh. ahrar un-t.
