GENESIS OF THE SOCIO-NATURAL PARADIGM OF THE ACADEMIC SCHOOLS IN LVIV AND DUBLIANY
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31734/agronomy2023.27.022Keywords:
coevolution, biosphere, history, soil science, soil dynamicsAbstract
In each region, there is a network of settlements as a part of the biosphere. It is able to withstand the structural and functional restructuring of its components due to the engaged behavioral mechanisms in the social elements of geosystems. The soil component of landscapes of the Lviv-Dubliany socio-natural agglomeration was often considered as a clear model of such resistance. Another example is represented by the established meadow ecosystems within the forest and subalpine belts of the Carpathians, which are the result of coevolution under the conditions of traditional land use. The paradigm of socio-natural evolution (coevolution) provides the opportunity to operate with the concepts of the evolutionary process in relation to heterogeneous socio-biotic systems. In the Carpathian region, changes in the socio-natural heritage integrated various changes in geosystems and soil cover in their composition. Models of such co-evolutionary integration are revealed in various complexes – from original soil-detrital to derived demutation formations. The soil cover contains evidence of behavioral changes in land use during different historical periods. Therefore, the criteria of behavioral ecology become a normative element in the knowledge of coevolutionary changes. At the same time, mnemonic and informational institutions (departments, reserves, museums, heritage sites) act as universal centers of analysis and forecast of the further coevolutionary development of the relations between man and nature. The dynamic conditions of settlements reflect the course of anthropogenic processes and, ultimately, the social consciousness and behavior of people. Metamorphoses of social behavior always accompany changes in the nature use. On the edge of the 19th and 20th centuries, intensification of agriculture and development of forestry were the most vivid coevolutionary manifestations. Significant transformations in the land use occurred in the times when the war, revolution, famine, epidemics had an integral effect on the intelligence and behavior of the community.
References
Andrushchenko H. O. Nomenclature list of soils of the Carpathian Mountains and adjacent territories. Methodology of large-scale soil research of collective farms and state farms of the Ukrainian SSR. Kharkiv: State Agricultural Publishing House of the Ukrainian SSR, 1958. P. 188–225. (in Ukrainian).
Andrushchenko H. O. Soils of the Western regions of the Ukrainian SSR. Lviv; Dubliany, Part 1. 295 p.; Part 2. 1970. 114 p. (in Ukrainian).
Au J. History and organization of National Agricultural University in Dublany. Annals of the National Agricultural University in Dubliany. 1888. No 1. 1888. P. 1–96.
Batukova L. R. The natural science approach of S. A. Podolinsky as a method that ensures the identification of the system-genetic basis for the development of socio-economic systems. Actual problems of economics and law. 2011. No 1. P. 5–10 (in Russian).
Bachynskyi H. A. Socioecology: Theoretical and applied aspects. Kyiv: Nauk. dumka, 1991. 152 p. (in Russian).
Bachynskyi H. O. Ukrainian way to the future. Universum. 1996. No 3–4. P. 18 (in Ukrainian).
Brzęk G. Museum of Dzieduszycki in Lviv and its Creator. Lublin: New Lublin Publishing House, 1994. 200 p.
Chernobai Yu. M. To the history of integrity methodology and paradigm of the natural-social coevolution. Lviv: Nauk. zap State Museum of Natural History. Issue 35. 2019. P. 3–14. (in Ukrainian).
Dybowski B. On ancient and scientific worldviews. Warsaw: Gebethner and Wolf. 1916. Cit. by: L. Kuznicki Evolutionism in Poland 1883–1959, Kosmos, 2009, Vol. 58, No 3–4. P. 297–313.
Goetel W. Sozology - the science of protecting nature and its resources. Cracow: Kosmos. 1966. Vol. 15, 5. P. 473–482.
Hnativ P. Genetic typology of the soils of the Eastern Carpathians in connection with anthropogenic processes. Bulletin of LNAU: agronomy. 2019. No 23. P. 244–248. (in Ukrainian).
Hnativ P., Snitynskyi V. Soil science and agrochemistry at Lviv National Agrarian University through the prism of centuries. Bulletin of LNAU: agronomy. 2019. No 23. P. 177–183. (in Ukrainian).
Holubets M. A. Introduction to geosociosystemology. Lviv: Polli Publishing House, 2005. 199 p. (in Ukrainian).
Holubets M. A., Hnativ P. S. Fundamentally about ecology, environmental science, nature conservation, environmental protection and geosociosystemology. Ecology and noospherology. 2007. Vol. 18, No. 1–2. P. 7–15. (in Ukrainian).
Michajłow W. Remarks on the science of nature conservation, its theoretical foundations and methodological assumptions, in: Kosmos. 1958. Vol. VII, 5. P. 533–536.
Moiseev N. N. Once again about the problem of coevolution. Questions of philosophy. 1998. No 8. P. 26–32. (in Russian).
Nusbaum-Hilarowicz J. The idea of evolution in biology: past, present and influence on the development of human knowledge. Warsaw: People's Printing House (Lviv: H. Altenberg), 1910. 555 p.
Pachosky I. K. Fundamentals of phytosociology. The course read at the agronomic faculty of Kherson Polytechnic Institute in 1919–1920. Kherson: Izd. study commit rural technical school, 1921. 346 p. (in Russian).
Paczoski J. You live a bunch of plants. Universe, 1896. Vot. 15, No 26. P. 401–404; No 27. P. 420–423; No 28. P. 443–446.
Pawlikowski J. G. Culture and nature. Lodz: Obywatel, 2010. 140 p.
Podolinsky S. A. Human labor and its attitude to the distribution of energy. Slovo. St. Petersburg, 1880. No 4/5. P. 135–211. (in Russian).
Podolynskyi S. A. Selected works. Kyiv: KNEU, 2000. P. 281. (in Ukrainian).
Podolynskyi A. Biodynamic agriculture. Introductory lectures. Lviv: LA «PYRAMIDA», 2009. 244 p. (in Ukrainian).
Pol W. Natural Museum in Lviv. Lviv: «Library of Sciences. plant them. Ossoliński», Vol. 1: No 4. P. 333–371; No 5, 1847. P. 445–499.
Pozniak S., Barannyk A. History of the study of mountain-meadow-brown earth soils of the Ukrainian Carpathians. History of Ukrainian geography: Ukrainian science and theory magazine Ternopil. 2014. Vol. 29, 30. P. 91–97. (in Ukrainian).
Professor Benedikt Dybovskyi is an outstanding researcher of common natural heritage of Poland, Belarus and Ukraine: Collection of articles. Lviv: Imperial Company, 2018. 180 p. (in Ukrainian).
Sochava V. B. Introduction to the doctrine of geosystems. Novosibirsk: Science, 1978. 320 p. (in Russian).
Swederski W., Szafran B. Further research on increasing the efficiency of the eastern Carpathian pastures. ibid. 1936. No 16 (2). P. 180–237.
Szulc K. Meteorological observations on Potonina Pozyzewska in the Czarnohorskie range in the Eastern Carpathians in 1911. Kosmos, 1912. Vol. 37. P. 483–490.
Vainer (Winer) D. Ecology in Soviet Russia. Archipelago of freedom: nature reserves and conservation. Moscow: Progress, 1991. 400 p. (in Russian).
Vernadsky W. La geochimie. Paris, Librairie F61ix Alcan, 1924. Mention of Podolinsky's two works on solar energy. Р. 334–335.
Vernadskyi V. I. Scientific thought as a planetary phenomenon. Moscow: DirectMEDIA, 1977. 191 p.
Vernadsky V. I. Diaries: March 1921 – August 1925. 2nd ed. Moscow: Science. 1999. P. 114. (in Russian).
Vernadsky W. La geochimie. Paris, Librairie F61ix Alcan, 1924. Mention of Podolinsky's two works on solar energy. P. 334–335. (in French).
Yamelynets T. S. Historical stages of formalization of the soil data and transformation of the soil map as an information model of soil data. Scientific records of the Ternopil V. Hnatiuk National Ped. University. Series: Geography. 2020. No 1 (issue 48). P. 32–42. (in Ukrainian).
Yamelynets T. S. Informational soil science: monograph. Lviv: Ivan Franko LNU, 2022. 352 p. (in Ukrainian).
Zlupko S. Ecohomology – a new modern scientific direction (causes and conditions of formation). Regional economy. 2004. No 3. P. 33–44. (in Ukrainian).
